Monday, 1 July 2013

Cruel and stupid: the trademarks of this government

Impact of housing benefit changes 'worse than feared'

The consequences of the housing benefit cut introduced in April are worse than feared, the National Housing Federation has said. Rent arrears have soared in some areas while larger houses are lying empty as people refuse to move into them. Ministers say the impact of the benefit cut is being monitored closely. The government wants to end what it calls the "spare room subsidy" for social tenants, but critics have dubbed the move a "bedroom tax".

"The impact is at least as bad as we had anticipated, in many respects even worse," says David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation. "What we've seen are really bad effects on individuals, people whose lives have been turned upside down, who are very frightened about the future," says Mr Orr.

One of the government's stated aims for cutting housing benefit for people with spare rooms was to get them to move, thereby freeing up homes for families living in overcrowded properties. Ministers say this is starting to happen but two housing associations have told BBC News that since the welfare change, they have large family homes lying empty because tenants cannot afford to move into them.

Coast and Country Housing, which owns more than 10,000 properties on Teesside, says it is struggling to rent out some properties. "The numbers of empty homes we've got to let are increasing significantly," says Iain Sim, chief executive of Coast and Country. "People are now telling us that because of bedroom tax, they can no longer afford to move into the bigger family homes, and as a consequence of that we're getting fewer lettings and more empty houses."

Across the country in Merseyside, it is a similar story. Cobalt Housing, which owns nearly 6,000 mainly family homes in Liverpool, says the benefit change is putting "terrible pressure" on tenants. "We have perfectly good, three-bedroom homes that people are telling us they can't afford to live in, because of the bedroom tax," says managing director, Alan Rogers.

In a statement, the Department for Work and Pensions said: "The removal of the spare room subsidy [ie the addition of bedroom tax] is returning fairness to housing when in England alone there are nearly two million households on the social housing waiting list and over a quarter of a million tenants are living in overcrowded homes. As with any major reform, we are monitoring the changes to housing benefit closely - including possible arrears levels and how councils are spending the extra £150m in funding for vulnerable claimants."

Source: BBC News

David Cameron's awayday weekend to Kazakhstan

David Cameron, having inaugurated the world's costliest oil project in Kazakhstan, said he hoped the thirty businessmen accompanying him (from Rolls-Royce, British Gas, Ernst & Young et al) would sign more than £700m worth of deals during his two-day trip. Since its independence in 1991, officials say British firms have invested about $20 billion in their economy, part of a total $170 billion ploughed into Kazakhstan since then.


Human Rights Watch says Kazakhstan's human rights record has "seriously deteriorated". Freedom of assembly is strictly controlled, independent media outlets have been shut down, restrictive law on religious freedoms remains in force and strikes in certain sectors are banned.


Still, as long as we're in the "global race for jobs and investment. This is one of the most rapidly emerging countries in the world", after all.

Reuters - http://reut.rs/12f81zM
Channel 4 News - http://bit.ly/12f89PA

Simon Jenkins: What is David Cameron doing in Kazakhstan? 

Saturday, 29 June 2013

Armed Forces Day: Ministers break promise to exempt military families from Bedroom Tax


EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO 
THE HOUSING BENEFIT (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS 2013 
2013 No. 665

"[Section] 7. Policy background 

7.3  In response to concerns raised ...

• People who are approved foster carers ...

• Adult children who are in the Armed Forces (including the Reserve Forces) but who 
continue to live with parents will be treated as continuing to live at home, even when deployed on operations. This means that they will continue to be treated as 
occupying the room if they intend to return home."

So said the explanatory memorandum on government website legislation.gov.uk with regards to members of the Armed Forces and the Bedroom Tax. Only for us to find out, three months later, that the government has changed its mind. According to the Mirror, it now says that soldiers’ homes stop being their main residence once they have moved into barracks, meaning their families are being hit with the bedroom tax as they are deemed to have “spare” rooms.

But then we should have realised the exemption was too good to be true - it was published on April 1st 2013.

Happy Armed Forces Day!

Three-person IVF

Morland, The Times

Friday, 28 June 2013

Government's flagship Work Programme finds jobs for just 1 in 10

Just one in ten people on the Government’s flagship back-to-work scheme have been found jobs, damning figures revealed today. Of the 1.2million unemployed placed on the Work Programme, 1,071,900 have not found long-term jobs. The figures are even worse for the out-of-work disabled - where 97 out of every 100 have been failed.

Shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne said: “No wonder the benefits bill is £21billion higher than planned.” TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady added: “People who lose their jobs need support, not a raft of vicious new welfare policies that will hurt them and their families.”

Overall, the Work Programme has helped 132,000 long-term unemployed into jobs - a dramatic improvement on the previous year when just 9,000 were helped into work. The Department for Work and Pensions claimed the figures showed the “growing success” of the programme.

The DWP said the new figures only counted those who have been in work for long periods - six months in most cases, or three months for the hardest to help. But critics have attacked the programme for not doing enough to help long-term unemployed find work.

Under the Work Programme, charities and businesses are paid according to results to get people into work, with extra bribes to get the hardest to help into work. By the end of March, just over a million people had been referred to the programme. Just 8.5% of those who started on it in June 2011 completed at least three months of work in their first year, increasing to 13.4% for more recent recruits who joined in March of this year.

Dame Anne Begg, who chairs the Work and Pensions Select Committee, said the figures did nothing “to reduce the fear that the Work Programme is failing to reach harder-to-help jobseekers”. She added: “We remain deeply concerned that the Work Programme, as currently designed, is insufficient to tackle the problems faced by more disadvantaged jobseekers.”

But Employment Minister Mark Hoban said: “The Work Programme is helping large numbers of people escape the misery of long-term unemployment and get back into real jobs."

Daily Mirror

Sunday, 23 June 2013

Spending review for 2015-16

• On Wednesday, George Osborne is due to announce £11.5bn of cuts for 2015-16 by outlining plans for limits on previously uncontrolled parts of the public finances, such as housing benefit. Unemployment benefit and state pensions are unlikely to be affected.
> Telegraph http://bit.ly/17v2flv

• Vince Cable is refusing to accept deep cuts to his departmental budget without a guarantee of billions in funding for job-creating capital projects. The business secretary is arguing that the coalition must have "a strong story to tell on growth" to run alongside its tough message on slashing the budget deficit and balancing the books by 2018.

• Progress towards agreeing reduced 2015-16 budgets with Whitehall departments has been slowed by an attempt to win hundreds of millions of pounds extra for the Government's Troubled Families programme, led by Louise Casey.
> Independent http://ind.pn/17v34uF

Monday, 17 June 2013

G8 protests in Northern Ireland

Click on image to enlarge





Saturday, 15 June 2013

99 weeks to go ... and you bet we're counting

Voters go to the polls nearly every week in different parts of the country, with the results pored over by election strategists for signs of which way the political wind is blowing. 

This week, Labour's Steve Battlemuch won a landslide victory at a council by-election in Wollaton West - wiping out the last remaining Tory stronghold in Nottingham. Nottingham South is a must-win marginal for the Conservatives. However at Walkergate, in Newcastle, the Conservatives scored 27.2%, coming second and slashing Labour's margin of victory by two-thirds.

Labour clung on to Woolston, a Southampton City seat, by 133 votes from UKIP, with the Tories 27 votes further behind in third place. The ward is in marginal Southampton Itchen, currently represented in the Commons for Labour by former cabinet minister John Denham.

Labour gained Kirklees Borough, West Yorkshire, from the Tories, on a swing from Conservative to Labour of 7.4%.

BBC News

Friday, 14 June 2013

Careers advice

If you're wondering what line of work might be rewarding in years to come, debt collection is looking good. Council tax arrears, non-payment of bedroom tax, students defaulting on their newly-privatised loans - life looks rosy for the bailiffs.

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

You can't trust Cameron with the NHS


"The revelation that A&E waiting times have hit a ten-year high under David Cameron demolishes once and for all the Tory spin that the A&E crisis has nothing to do with them.

"David Cameron and Jeremy Hunt have wasted precious time provoking a fight with GPs to distract attention from their own failings.

"Their arrogance and complacency in the face of a crisis is one of the greatest dangers the NHS faces ... The crisis in A&E proves that you can’t trust David Cameron with the NHS."

Andy Burnham, shadow health secretary

Saturday, 18 May 2013

One week's worth of food bank news


• Food bank visits in north-east up 470%, Trussell Trust says - http://bbc.in/16ERonG

• New food bank will help needy people in Brigg area - http://bit.ly/14A1vWx

• New food banks set to be rolled out across Glasgow - http://bit.ly/14A1Ngb

• Number using food banks in Wales more than doubles in year - http://bbc.in/14A27LW

• Starving students helped with food bank at Swansea Metropolitan University - http://bit.ly/14A0M7O

• New Larne food bank scheme helps dozens of clients - http://bit.ly/14A2GFx

• New food bank launched in West Cumbria - http://bit.ly/14A2RR9

• Food bank in Wednesbury will close unless donations rise - http://bit.ly/14A35YL

• Demand for North East's Bay Foodbank has tripled - http://bit.ly/14A3lXB

• Benefit changes prompt call for SE17 food bank - http://bit.ly/14A3BFY

• Somerset village to get its own foodbank - http://bit.ly/14A3RVn

• Newton Aycliffe food bank receives vital boost - http://bit.ly/14A47nB

• Hungry wait desperately for Glasgow North West food bank to open - http://bit.ly/14A4n60

• Increased need sees food bank open in Sutton Coldfield - http://bit.ly/14A4BKa

• Welfare cuts push Swindon Foodbank use up - http://bit.ly/14A4Tkn

• Whitstable and Herne Bay Food Bank crisis means charity starts locally - http://bit.ly/14A5e6H

• Plan to open 'needed' foodbank in Windsor emerges in the week town is named 'wealthiest' in the UK - http://bit.ly/14A5Au2

• One ton of food collected for Crosby’s new foodbank - http://bit.ly/14A5RNE

• Food bank to aid Ryedale families in crisis - http://bit.ly/14A6sif

• Calder Valley Food Bank team seek help ahead of launch - http://bit.ly/14A6LcV

• Hertford Foodbank helps 84 people - http://bit.ly/14A6SoL

• New food bank opens in Wickford - http://bit.ly/14A6XsA

• Redhill church expands foodbank after crisis call from Citizens Advice Bureau - http://bit.ly/14A74UW

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

Margaret Thatcher


"There is no such thing as society" - Margaret Thatcher, 1988

"There is no such thing as Margaret Thatcher" - Society, 2013

Monday, 8 April 2013

Local elections 2nd May 2013

There are 27 county councils, seven unitary authorities and two Mayoral elections in England. The Isle of Anglesey will also be up for election in Wales. Here is the full list:

County councils

All of the seats on these are up for election:

Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Cumbria, Derbyshire, Devon, Dorset, East Sussex, Essex, Gloucestershire, Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Kent, Lancashire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Norfolk, North Yorkshire, Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire, Oxfordshire, Somerset, Staffordshire, Suffolk, Surrey, Warwickshire, West Sussex, Worcestershire.

Unitary authorities

All the seats for these are up for election, except in Bristol which is elected by thirds:

Bristol, Cornwall, Durham, Isle of Wight, Northumberland, Shropshire, Wiltshire.

Mayoral elections

Doncaster, North Tyneside, Wales, Isle of Anglesey.

Others

The Isles of Scilly unitary authority is also up for election and there may be other council by-elections taking place on 2nd May.

- • -

WIPE OUT THE TORIES, ELIMINATE THE LIB DEMS

Sunday, 7 April 2013

Company profits depend on the 'welfare payments' they get from society

In a Guardian article, Ha-Joon Chang argues that the free market is a myth. From drug patents to quantitative easing, businesses make money because of state help. Here's an extract from the article.

'Today, many banks all over the world would not have existed but for the huge public money poured into them in the aftermath of the 2008 crisis. Even in the case of those that have not been bailed out, their profits would have been much lower (or their losses far bigger, in the case of loss-making ones) without the cheap money showered on them – without any condition, unlike in the case of state supports such as unemployment benefit – through cuts in interest rates and the quantitative easing by the Bank of England.

In other instances, the social protection of business is more roundabout. The horsemeat scandal has revealed that British supermarkets and the European meat industry have made higher profits from the relaxation of regulations regarding food standards, introduced by the coalition government in 2010 in the name of cutting government spending and, more important, "red tape". The Poundland scandal has revealed that British retail stores would make lower profits if they were not allowed to use the claimants of unemployment benefits as unpaid workers.

Businesses make what profits they make only because the government, and the electorate as the ultimate sovereign (at least in theory), helps them in all sorts of ways – free money (banks), free workers (Poundland), monopoly rights (pharmaceutical companies), implicit permission for substandard products (supermarkets).

Once we accept that the amounts of profit companies make are ultimately determined by these "welfare payments" society decides to confer upon them, we begin to see the problem with the free-market view that has dominated the world for the last few decades.

For far too long we have been told by the business lobby and free-market ideologues that profit is the objective indicator of a company's contribution to the economy, when it is really socially and politically determined. Poor people receiving government benefits have been told far too often that they are spongers, when the rich get even more government benefits.

It is time that we dispensed with the myth that the market is a force of nature that should not be meddled with. Markets are social creations that can be, and have been, modified for social purposes.'

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

Unite union proposes first general strike since 1926

Unite, Britain’s biggest trade union, is urging other unions to join forces to stage a 24-hour general strike in what it privately admits would be an “explicitly political” attack against the government. The threat comes as Number 10 on Tuesday ruled out speculation that it was to freeze or even cut the minimum wage, as it embarked on the largest contraction to date in the welfare state with the aim of making “work pay”.

Leaders from across the movement will discuss the idea of a general strike later this month at a meeting of the Trades Union Congress’s general council, with members divided over how to respond to the government’s attempts to curb public spending. Unite, which has 1.5m members, has put forward a paper urging the TUC to “prepare for such mass industrial action”.

Unite argues that “such action is desirable” as it would not only put pressure on the government to change course but it would also enhance the credibility of the entire labour movement. “It would be a landmark in our movement’s recovery of its morale, strength and capacity to play a leading part in a society crying out for credible and honourable leadership,” the paper says.

Unite holds back from proposing an early date and acknowledges it would take months to build support. Unions would have to win the backing of members in ballots. The union proposes a voluntary levy across the movement’s 6.5m-strong membership to pay the wages of “particular selected and identified” groups of workers striking on behalf of the TUC’s wider objectives.

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

How Universal Credit and tax allowances will conflict

The introduction of the government’s flagship welfare reform, Universal Credit, introduces a major new challenge for any politician hoping to help struggling households with tax cuts. The design of Universal Credit means that, unlike under today’s tax credit system, cuts in taxes for low to middle income working families will be counteracted by reductions in a household’s Universal Credit entitlement. Put simply, under UC, tax cuts will not, in large part, reach low to middle income working households.

The reason can be summed up as follows. When someone’s taxes are cut – whether through an allowance increase or a 10p tax rate – this increases their post-tax income. However, in calculating the amount of Universal Credit a household receives, the government provides 65 pence less UC for each pound the family’s income increases after tax. This 65 per cent figure is known as the UC ‘taper’. Consequently, having cut taxes with one hand, it takes away nearly two thirds of the gain with the other.

Specifically, a tax allowance hike of £1000 would be expected to lead to a gain of £200 in post-tax income. However, this increase in post-tax income leads to a reduction of £130 in Universal Credit, and therefore a net gain of just £70. This means that rather than every taxpayer gaining a flat rate £200, those in the greatest need gain barely a third this amount – while those higher up, and not in receipt of Universal Credit, gain the full amount. With a tax cut achieved through a 10% tax band, the effect on Universal Credit is the same. Nearly two thirds of any benefit would be lost for those in UC.

This interaction between taxes and in-work benefits does not apply to large parts of the existing welfare system. While Council Tax Benefit and Housing Benefit are already assessed on the basis of net income, tax credits are assessed on the basis of pre-tax income, meaning that a tax cut has no effect on the amount of tax credit support received. The result is that, once UC is up and running (it is being phased in from later this year), tax cuts, already a relatively inefficient way of supporting low to middle income households, will become almost exclusively a policy for helping households on middle and higher incomes. For some time, as UC is rolled out gradually, those who happen to be on the new system will receive a far smaller gain from tax cuts than those remaining on the existing system.

Sunday, 31 March 2013

Welfare reforms: 42 cuts since May 2010

Duncan Smith argues universal credit will simplify the system, making it easier for people on benefits to make the leap into work. According to the government, a third of the 8 million households it covers will be better off. But about 450,000 disabled people will lose financially, according to Disability Rights UK, while 400,000 of the poorest households – such as single parent households with children – will be worse off by 2015, according to the Chartered Institute of Housing.

This latest phase of benefits reform will bring to 42 the bewildering number of social security cuts introduced by the coalition since May 2010. Collectively, these cuts mean households will cumulatively receive £16bn less than in 2010-11, says the CPAG. By 2015, ministers are aiming to save £18bn a year from the welfare budget, and they have signalled a further £10bn cut from 2016. The spending review in June is expected to set out further measures to contain the growing welfare bill.

Social analysts are concerned that deprivation levels are going back to those of 30 years ago, with the poorest families worse off than they were under Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s.Debt and food poverty are growing, homelessness is increasing, and demand on food banks is soaring – a sign of more people falling through the welfare net. The social impact of this impoverishment of Britain's poorest families – with more than 60% of such households in work – will unravel recent achievements in tackling poverty, say campaigners. According to Alison Garnham, chief executive of the CPAG, the coalition "is on course to leave behind the worst child poverty record of any government for a generation".

Others see the welfare agenda as presaging a profound shift in the relationship between the state and its most vulnerable citizens. "Last year I warned that we risk a decade of destitution. Some thought I was being over-dramatic," says Julia Unwin, head of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. "I am more convinced than ever that we have a perfect storm brewing; the reforms to welfare, the economic slowdown and spiralling costs, together with an increasingly spiteful tone in how we describe people in poverty, risks the UK becoming a nation where people face destitution."

Patrick Butler, The Guardian

Thursday, 14 March 2013

The Radical Government

“It’s mad when you can buy cans of lager for 25p or two litres of cider for less than £2. So we need to deal with that and this shows a radical government, not frightened of taking big decisions, rolling up its sleeves and getting on with the job.”
David Cameron, March 2012

Government to shelve plans for minimum price on alcohol - http://ind.pn/16pQUzF 
Guardian, March 2013

Saturday, 9 March 2013

Britons have lost faith in George Osborne's austerity plan

A majority of people now believe that the government's economic policies are hurting rather than healing the British economy, a new poll reveals, as cabinet divisions over how best to stimulate a return to growth threaten to destabilise the coalition.

With 10 days until George Osborne delivers his crucial fourth budget, an Opinium/Observer poll shows almost three times as many voters (58%) believe the austerity drive is harming the economy as those who think it is the correct medicine to restore it to health (20%).

The findings, which follow a stinging rebuke to David Cameron on Friday by the government's own financial watchdog, will add to pressure on Osborne to change course as the UK hovers on the brink of a triple-dip recession.

The independent Office for Budget Responsibility rebutted claims by the prime minister that the government's deficit-cutting strategy was not responsible for choking off growth, stating that austerity had knocked 1.4% off GDP in the past two years.

In the first two years of the coalition, most polls showed solid support for the government's hard line on the spending cuts, though the Tory lead over Labour on economic competence has narrowed in recent weeks.

The stark poll findings come as home secretary Theresa May appeared to make a subtle pitch for the leadership of the Tory party, arguing in a speech to a ConservativeHome conference that the Tories must govern for the whole country, not just sectional interests. May said: "We're at our strongest when anyone and everyone can feel that the Conservative party is for them." The speech, resembling a leader's party conference delivery in its scope and tone, was seen as an attempt to raise her profile at a time when many Tories are losing faith in Cameron's ability to remain as leader beyond the next election.

In a further worrying development for the coalition – and for Labour – the poll shows Nigel Farage's Ukip at 17%, more than double the Lib Dems' rating, as the populist anti-EU party siphons off support from both the Tories, who are down 2% on 27% compared with a fortnight ago, and Labour, down 2% on 39%.

Even among Tory voters, only 55% thought the government's economic policies were benefiting the country. Among Lib Dem backers, just 24% thought they were helping to restore the economy.

Tensions over economic policy surfaced at the Liberal Democrat conference in Brighton, where business secretary Vince Cable – who has called for more borrowing to fund housing and other infrastructure – warned against allowing the Tories to carry on waging an "ideological jihad against public spending and public services".

Former Liberal Democrat minister Paul Burstow joined those voicing serious doubts, saying it was crucial that the rate of deficit reduction did not inflict "great damage" on the British economy's potential to bounce back to growth.

"The government has been very focused on deficit reduction quite rightly, but that shouldn't be at the expense of doing everything possible to encourage growth," he said. "There is a growing concern that quantitative easing is not putting real money into the economy and we need to look at what we can do differently to put money into the economy."

Former leader Paddy Ashdown, who is heading the party's election strategy, said he disagreed with Cable's call for more borrowing, arguing there was no reason to believe it would be a panacea for Britain's economic problems. While Ashdown said he wanted the party to make a habit of being in government, he acknowledged that it was a constant battle "with Tory heartlessness to fight, and tough decisions to take in government".

The conference was mired in controversy as a motion calling for an emergency debate on economic strategy was rejected.

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg, grilled about the lack of growth during a stormy question-and-answer session, called for discipline from Liberal Democrats and stressed there was no "magic wand" that would pull the economy round in a hurry.

Asked by former Lib Dem London mayoral candidate Brian Paddick whether there would be more growth if the Tories were not leading the government, Clegg said there was no easy way to economic success.

This week Labour will step up pressure over the economy by calling for an urgent review of the Bank of England's Funding for Lending scheme, after figures showed net lending had fallen despite the scheme having been in operation for six months. Lending to businesses is down more than overall lending, which Labour believes is a factor in holding back recovery.

Meanwhile, a poll conducted in marginal seats by the Tory former deputy chairman Lord Ashcroft, based on interviews with more than 19,000 voters in 213 constituencies, showed the Conservatives were on course to lose 93 seats to Labour if an election were held today.

This is lower than the national swing suggested by headline voting intention polls, partly because Labour is finding it hard to break through in Conservative seats in London and parts of the south.

It suggested that Labour would win 93 of the 109 most marginal Conservative seats in which it is in second place. The swing to Labour would be biggest in the Thames Estuary, the Midlands and some northern seats, but lower in southern towns and suburbs of London.

Emphasising that the poll represented a snapshot not a prediction, Ashcroft said: "I don't want to see a Labour majority of four, let alone 84. But I hope this puts the challenge into some sort of perspective. We have a long way to go to hold on to the seats we gained last time, let alone pick up many more. But things are slightly less grim than the headline polls suggest and we have everything to play for."

A Tory source said the party did not believe the Ashcroft polling accurately represented the state of the parties.

"Private and public polling repeatedly shows when faced with a straight choice between [Ed] Miliband and Cameron the public choose Cameron," he said. "Historically opposition parties who go on to win are at this stage in the parliament more than 20 points in front. Labour are nowhere near that.

"One year ago today we were marginally ahead in the polls. A lot can happen in a year. We need to go out there and demonstrate our strengths to electors. We are already outlining things on our side – a reduction of deficit, more private sector jobs and more people in employment."

Toby Helm and Daniel Boffey, The Observer

Wednesday, 6 March 2013

Just one day in the life of this coalition of clowns

• NHS private sector climb-down a 'humiliating U-turn'
> Guardian

• Bedroom tax: ministers given 14 days to make case against judicial review
> Guardian


• Osborne outnumbered 26 to 1 on EU bank bonus caps
> Telegraph


• Eric Pickles to face judicial review over energy efficiency row
> Guardian

• Food banks are thriving, much to the government's embarrassment
> Guardian

• Ed Davey defends green deal interest rates
> Guardian

• Universal credit benefits system 'in meltdown', claims Labour
> Guardian

• Coalition policy on competition in the NHS is in utter chaos
> Guardian